Cost Segregation Myths and Facts

There are many myths surrounding cost segregationEach of these methods is acceptable and each has
and its benefits. The truths behind those myths arebeen and will be used by tax payers to do cost
discussed below, as well as some answers to verysegregation studies. All six approaches, or blended
important questions.versions of them, are acceptable to the IRS. No one
Myths:method is favored.
The IRS prefers one method to another There are noMyth: There are no real standards for a Cost
real standards for a cost segregation study A CPASegregation Study.
cannot really provide a cost segregation study; youThe IRS has established a set of guidelines that define
need a "professional".what they call a "quality study." The definition of a
Myth: The IRS prefers one method for valuation to"quality study" is one that addresses each of the 13
another.elements listed below.
The IRS has identified six methods for providing cost- Preparation by an individual with expertise and
segregation services, each having its pluses andexperience
minuses. More important is that the IRS does not- Detailed description of the methodology
endorse or favor one method over the other.- Use of appropriate documentation
According to the IRS Audit Techniques Guide:- Interviews conducted with appropriate parties
Neither the Service nor any group or association of- Use of a common nomenclature
practitioners has established any requirements or- Use of a standard numbering system
standards for the preparation of cost segregation- Explanation of the legal analysis
studies. The courts have addressed component- Determination of unit costs and engineering
depreciation, but have not specifically addressed the"take-offs"
methodologies of cost segregation studies.- Organization of assets into lists or groups
The Service has addressed this issue but only briefly,- Reconciliation of total allocated costs to total actual
i.e., Revenue Ruling 73-410, 1973-2 C.B. 53, Privatecosts
Letter Ruling (PLR) 7941002 (June 25, 1979), Chief- Explanation of the treatment of indirect costs
Counsel Advice Memorandum 199921045 (April 1, 1999).- Identification and listing of section 1245 property
These documents all emphasize that the determination- Consideration of related aspects (e.g., IRC §
of § 1245 property is factually intensive and must263A, Change In Accounting Method and Sampling
be supported by corroborating evidence. In addition, anTechniques)
underlying assumption is that the study is performed byMyth: A CPA cannot really provide a Cost
"qualified" individuals or firms, such as those employingSegregation Study, you need a "professional".
"...personnel competent in design, construction, auditing,This myth clearly assumes CPAs lack the expertise to
and estimating procedures relating to buildingperform cost segregation analyses. Especially on new
construction" (PLR 7941002).construction, where there are good cost records, a
The six IRS-approved methods are:knowledgeable CPA can do a more than acceptable
- Detailed engineering approach from actual costjob in preparing a cost segregation study. With proper
recordscost records, a CPA can effectively and professionally
- Detailed engineering cost estimate approachcomplete an engineering-type study using cost records.
- Survey or letter approachIn many cases, we find ourselves assisting a CPA, not
- Residual estimation approachby providing the valuation, but by helping to assign lives
- Sampling or modeling approachof assets and assuring that the assets are properly
- "Rule of thumb" approachallocated.